Postdigital Information Behaviour and GOT Fandom
Fan Studies Network Australasia Conference
11-13 December 2019
Swinburne University of Technology
Eric Forcier, PhD Candidate, Swinburne University of Technology, firstname.lastname@example.org
In the field of library and information studies, the study of how individuals access, use, share, interact and engage with information is referred to as information behaviour. Information behaviour models and approaches dovetail research in audience and fan studies, and yet few studies have deliberately incorporated elements from both domains in the study of fans (Price & Robinson, 2016). This presentation explores how the study of fans can be framed through the lens of information behaviour, using examples from ongoing research into transmedia fans and fan communities, specifically within the Game of Thrones fandom.
Sandvoss, Lee and Harrington (2017) point out that the more “being a fan” is commonplace, the more it shapes the identities and communities in our mediated world (p. 23). By extension, the practices of fans also influence the ever-evolving ways in which people access, use and share information and how information itself is represented (Floridi, 2014). As such, fans can offer profound insights for researchers. For example, Archive of Our Own’s “tag wranglers” have developed a successful model for fan-based information organization that could be applied to similar digital corpora (McCullough, 2019).
The information behaviours of fans also provide answers around how technology is transforming everyday life (Forcier, 2017). The presentation will examine the Game of Thrones fandom in the context of information behaviour. The Twitter community #FakeWesteros, as a case study, demonstrates how narrative information shapes fan identity through parody and pastiche in the digital space. More broadly, ongoing research explores how fans of storyworlds told across multiple platforms and experienced via multiple media negotiate complex narrative information. The presentation will include specific information behaviours and practices these “transmedia fans” have described in interviews for engaging with and managing their fandoms.
Agarwal, N. K. (2015). Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. Information Research, 20(3). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/20-3/paper675.html#.Wb7wZMiGNaQ
Case, D. O. & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (4th ed.). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (second edition). London, UK: Sage.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Randall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Evans, E. (2011). Transmedia television : Audiences, new media, and daily life. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Evans, E. (2016). Negotiating “engagement” within transmedia culture. Paper presented at the Summer School in Cultural Studies, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland. Retrieved December 30, 2016 from http://www.academia.edu/26560923/Negotiating_Engagement_within_Transmedia_Culture
Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2015). The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer Open Access. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-04093-6
Forcier, E. (2017). Re(a)d Wedding: A case study exploring the everyday information behaviours of the transmedia fan. In S. Erdelez & N.K. Agarwal (Eds.), Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (pp. 93–101.) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2017. [Link] [PDF]
Hills, M. (2013). Fiske’s ‘textual productivity’ and digital fandom: Web 2.0 democratization versus fan distinction? Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 10(1): pp. 130-153. Retrieved from: https://www.participations.org/Volume%2010/Issue%201/9%20Hills%2010.1.pdf
McCullough, G. (2019). Fans are better than tech at organizing information. WIRED. Retrieved on June 18, 2019 from https://www.wired.com/story/archive-of-our-own-fans-better-than-tech-organizing-information/
Ocepek, M. (2017). Bringing out the everyday in everyday information behavior. Journal of Documentation 74(2), pp. 398-411. DOI: I 10.1108/JD-10-2016-0119.
Price, L. & Robinson, L. (2016). “Being in a knowledge space”: Information behaviour of cult media fan communities. Journal of Information Science 43(5), 649-664.
Price, L. (2017). Serious Leisure in the Digital World: Exploring the Information Behaviour of Fan Communities. PhD dissertation. Retrieved from: https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:16513/
Ross, C. S. (1999). Finding without seeking: The information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing and Management, 35, 783-799.
Rothbauer, P. (2004). Finding and creating possibility: Reading in the lives of lesbian, bisexual and queer young women (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/paulette_rothbauer/17/.
Sandvoss, C., Gray, J. & Harrington, C. L. (2017). Introduction: Why still study fans? In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, and C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World, Second edition (pp. 1-26). New York: New York University Press.
Serantes, L. C. (2014). Young adults reflect on the experience of reading comics in contemporary society: Overcoming the commonplace and recognizing complexity (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3442&context=etd.
Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1995). Measuring information: An information services perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.